Bay Area Villains

What the Bay Area Actually Lost When the A's Left Oakland, and Why It Still Stings

Three straight World Series in the seventies, the Bash Brothers, a twenty-game winning streak, and a fan base that got told it was the problem. The legacy, written down before it gets rewritten.

Bay Area Sports Blog Staff · Athletics
Bay Area Sports Blog: What the Bay Area Actually Lost When the A's Left Oakland, and Why It Still Stings

The version of this story that will get told in ten years is that Oakland couldn't support a baseball team. It's worth writing the real one down now, while everyone still remembers.

Fifty-seven years. The Athletics played in Oakland from 1968. That's three generations of families, an entire regional identity, and a franchise that was, for long stretches, one of the genuinely great operations in the sport.

The seventies. Three consecutive World Series championships. Not a contender, not a nice story, a dynasty, in green and gold, with a roster full of personalities that a modern marketing department wouldn't survive. Very few franchises in the history of the sport have done what those teams did.

The eighties and the Bash Brothers. Canseco and McGwire turned Oakland into the loudest ballpark in America for a few summers, and the sport into something bigger and more complicated. That era is remembered nationally as a scandal. Around here it's also remembered as a time when the Coliseum was the most fun building in baseball.

Moneyball and the twenty-game streak. A small-market team out-thinking the sport, and a twenty-game winning streak that remains one of the most extraordinary runs anyone has produced. That story got a book and a film, and the film made the franchise a global brand, which is its own bitter joke, given what happened next.

What the fan base actually did. This is the part that gets erased. When those teams were good, that building was as loud and as committed as anywhere in the sport. The right-field bleachers were an institution. The drumming, the flags, the whole culture of it was produced by people who were told for twenty years that their stadium was inadequate and their attendance was insufficient, while the product on the field was systematically stripped every time it got good.

The honest accounting. The Coliseum genuinely was a poor facility by the end. Oakland's political process genuinely failed to deliver a replacement. Both true. And also true: a franchise that traded away every good player it developed, ran one of the lowest payrolls in the sport for years, and then pointed at empty seats as evidence that the market had failed. You don't get to starve a thing and then call it dead.

The Coliseum itself. It became a punchline, the sewage, the tarps over the upper deck, the possums. All of that was real and all of it was also the predictable end state of a building nobody was allowed to invest in. It's worth remembering that the same concrete bowl once held the loudest crowds in the sport, and that a stadium doesn't decay on its own.

What's left. A Triple-A ballpark in West Sacramento, two more summers of it, and then a dome in Nevada. The relocation timeline has the dates. The Bay Area Villains column has the anger. This page is just the record, so that when somebody says Oakland didn't care, there's something to point at.

The rest of our coverage is on the A's hub.

More coverage: Bay Area Sports section · Bay Area Sports · Bay Area Sports Blog home