What $147 Million in Salary Actually Bought the Warriors, and Why the Rest of the Roster Looks Like That
Curry, Butler and Green account for the overwhelming majority of the payroll. Everything strange about this roster is downstream of that one fact.
Roster construction arguments usually get emotional. This one doesn't need to. You can explain almost everything odd about the 2026-27 Warriors with three numbers off the payroll.
The three numbers. Curry at $62.5 million, Butler at $56.8 million, Draymond at $27.6 million. That's roughly $147 million committed to three players, two of whom are past their athletic peak and one of whom has a knee serious enough to keep him out of projected starting lineups.
I've read this sheet four times hoping it says something different. It doesn't.
What that leaves. Moses Moody at $12.5 million is the only other meaningful salary. After that it's Al Horford at $5.9 million, Brandin Podziemski at $5.6 million, Gui Santos at $4.6 million. Those aren't the contracts of a supporting cast built to win a title. They're the contracts of players a team can afford after it has already spent everything.
Why Santos is projected to start. Not because a $4.6 million forward beat out better options. Because there were no better options to sign. When three contracts eat the payroll, the fourth through ninth men come from the draft, the minimum, or internal development. That's the whole explanation, and it's also the reason the Kuminga episode mattered more than it appeared to at the time, a homegrown player who develops into a starter is worth more to this specific roster than to almost any other team in the league.
The bet the front office made. Butler's contract is the tell. Paying that much for a player of that age is a declaration that the plan is to win now, with Curry, while there's still a window. That's a defensible bet. It's also a bet with no hedge: if the knee doesn't hold, there's no cap space to fix it, no expiring contract to trade, and no obvious path back to flexibility for years.
What good roster construction looks like from here. Not a blockbuster, there's nothing to trade with. It looks like the boring version: hit on the draft picks, develop the players already on the roster, sign the right veterans at the minimum, and hope Horford-type signings keep outperforming their money. That's unglamorous and it's genuinely the only route available.
The honest verdict. This is a roster shaped by decisions made three and four years ago, not by anything happening this summer. The current front office is playing a hand it was dealt, and our front office column is where we make the argument about how it got dealt that way. What isn't arguable is the arithmetic: $147 million to three players means everyone else is playing for scale, and a team built that way needs its stars available. All of them. Most nights.
The projected lineup is on the depth chart page, the season read is in the season outlook, and the rest is on the Warriors hub.
More coverage: Bay Area Sports section · Bay Area Sports · Bay Area Sports Blog home